Intellectual Property

In an era defined by artificial intelligence (AI), protecting and managing intellectual property (IP) has never been more critical. As part of our AI legal services, our team of legal, policy and technology experts offers deep insights and actionable solutions to help clients navigate the complex intersection of AI innovation and IP law.

Explore our latest in-depth articles that provide insights to help you protect your most valuable assets.

How Does AI Affect Intellectual Property?

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence is reshaping the intellectual property landscape. From AI-generated creations to data-driven inventions, businesses face unique challenges and opportunities in protecting their innovations.

Our latest articles cover some of the key areas AI is impacting, including:

Each article provides legal perspectives and practical guidance to help businesses navigate these emerging issues. Staying informed and proactive is essential to leverage the competitive advantages of AI while managing its legal complexities.

Our Expertise in AI and Intellectual Property Law

At Squire Patton Boggs, we combine a deep understanding of AI technology with decades of experience in intellectual property law. With a multidisciplinary approach and a commitment to excellence, our global team delivers tailored solutions to meet the needs of organizations operating at the forefront of innovation.

By exploring the articles below, you will gain insights into how our experts approach IP challenges and deliver practical solutions that empower businesses to protect their assets and capitalize on AI's transformative potential.

What Other Areas of AI and the Law Do We Cover?

AI's impact extends across all facets of the legal landscape. In addition to intellectual property, we provide detailed analysis in the following areas:

  • Data privacy and digital – As data becomes the cornerstone of artificial intelligence, ensuring compliance with data privacy and protection laws is critical. We explore recent updates and trends in privacy regulations, offering strategies to navigate this complex landscape.
  • Corporate compliance – The integration of AI into corporate operations creates unique compliance challenges, from product safety standards to competition enforcement. Our lawyers provide actionable insights to help enhance corporate compliance programs and better navigate AI-related risks.
  • Labor and employment – AI is transforming workplace dynamics, from hiring practices to employee management. Our professionals address legal implications such as algorithmic discrimination, as well as new and proposed legislation in this space.
  • Policy and trade – The global adoption of AI is driving significant policy changes and trade considerations. We offer updates on key developments, such as governmental budgeting and international investment regulations, helping clients navigate this environment.

Our library of resources is designed to provide comprehensive insights into the multifaceted legal challenges of AI, equipping businesses to address interconnected issues effectively.

Contact Us for More Insights on AI and Intellectual Property

Navigating the complexities of intellectual property in the AI era demands expert guidance and a proactive strategy. At our firm, we are dedicated to providing clear, practical advice that enables your business to innovate responsibly and protect its competitive edge.

Read our latest articles for actionable insights or contact our team today to discuss your specific needs. Let our lawyers support your organization in managing intellectual property in an AI-driven world.

Explore Our In-depth Articles on AI and Intellectual Property

Meta’s eye-catching end-of-year acquisition of Manus, a Singapore-based developer of AI agents, for a purported value of more than $2 billion[1], reflects a wider sector shift towards the development and deployment of semi-autonomous, outcome-focused, software agents, which are capable of performing complex tasks without direct and constant human input. The Meta deal notably follows

It’s the most wonderful time of the year—unless you’re Santa and your trade secrets just got swiped by a disgruntled elf with no holiday cheer, wielding powerful magical artificial intelligence (AI) tools like “ElfGPT.” As snow falls over the North Pole and elves frantically race to meet their Christmas Eve deadline, a new kind of

As readers may recall, in February 2024, the USPTO issued guidance on inventorship in AI-assisted inventions, which we wrote about here. On November 26, 2025, the USPTO rescinded that guidance and replaced it with new guidance.By way of background, the February 2024 Guidance analyzed the naming of inventors for AI-assisted inventions using the

On 4 November 2025 the UK High Court handed down its judgment in the case of Getty Images (US) Inc (and others) v Stability AI Limited [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) [High Court Judgment Template].The case concerned the training, development and deployment of Stability AI’s “Stable Diffusion” generative AI model and, as one of

On August 4, the Deputy Commissioner of Patents issued a memorandum to Examiners on evaluation of claims in software-implemented inventions for subject matter eligibility under Section 101. While the memorandum does not fundamentally change the USPTO’s guidance published in the MPEP, the memorandum does provide useful clues as to how the USPTO and the Examining

Mike Tyson once said “[e]veryone has a plan until they get punched in the face.” This quote describes the confidence that organizations may have in their existing trade secret plans, until they encounter some of the evolving complexities of trade secret protection in this era of the combination of remote work and artificial intelligence (AI).

As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into business operations, IT contracts covering the provision of AI systems are evolving to include critical safeguards.  One emerging concept is the AI circuit breaker, a contractual mechanism that provides for an intervention, or override, where an AI system exhibits undesirable or harmful behavior. 
When contracting for AI, businesses

If you’re a patent practitioner who works with innovation related to artificial intelligence, you’ll want to consider the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Recentive Analytics, Inc. v. Fox. Corp. This decision is the first to explicitly consider patent eligibility in the context of the use of artificial intelligence.
The Federal Circuit affirmed the district

In October 2024 we reported on the case of Kompakwerk GmbH v Liveperson Netherlands B.V. [CL-2018-000802] which concerned the question of whether an agent selling access to end users in Great Britain to a third-party software as a service (SaaS) product should be considered an agent for the purposes of the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations