The EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act requires companies to disclose in certain cases whether content has been created or modified by AI. This also applies to companies that make use of AI such as image-generation programs for product advertising.Given that the new rules are enforceable from 2 August 2026, with fines up to EUR 15

Consistent with the recent strategic shift in policy around EU regulations, the EU’s seventh package of changes to simplify/lighten their burden has just been approved and, with it, we will see changes to the way the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act will be applied (although some obligations under this legislation are already in force).The EU’s Council

Our team members will be participating in several speaking engagements over the coming months, sharing perspectives on emerging trends, regulatory developments, and practical challenges across the global data privacy, AI, and cybersecurity landscape.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong recently issued an advisory memorandum (“Advisory”) to all “State Officials, Agencies and Concerned Parties” about how existing Connecticut laws apply to artificial intelligence (“AI”).In the Advisory, Attorney General Tong hints at enforcement priorities and offers businesses a roadmap for compliance in describing how Connecticut’s civil rights, privacy and data security,

In 2025, India’s approach on AI has shifted significantly from, “Will AI change the way business is done?” to “What is the best way to adopt it to enable business expansion?” Guided by the principles of People, Planet, and Progress, “Safe and trusted AI for all” has become the motto governing India’s approach to AI.

One of the most significantly litigated areas of privacy law is biometric privacy. Tools that collect biometric information and biometric identifiers—including facial geometries, fingerprint scans, and voiceprints—are increasingly common for businesses across industries. Unfortunately, such tools in recent years have become focuses of the plaintiffs’ bar.2025 saw continued developments in litigation under Illinois’ Biometric Information

The 2025 legislative cycle marked a pivotal year in US privacy law, defined not only by continued nationwide expansion into Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance, children’s and teen privacy and online safety, as well as emerging data categories, but by a major restructuring of California’s privacy enforcement infrastructure. California’s introduction of the Delete Request and